Backed-up Mills for Continuous Rolling

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 3
- File Size:
- 374 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 3, 1928
Abstract
THE strip industry made rapid strides in regard to both width and gage until about 1922, when the maximum width was about 20 in. In the hot mills, strips of thin gages in wide widths could be pro-duced, but only at a sacrifice of length of coil, con-siderable increase in power, and decreased tonnage out-put on the min. Hot mills, like the Bray sheet mill and the modern strip and skelp mills, demonstrated that . wider strip could readily be rolled, if such a product was desired. The strip manufacturers were really limited in width, not by the hot strip, but by the cold rolling of wide strip. This factor was roll pressure. The diameter of rolls increased as the width of strip increased. For cold rolling strip 20 in. wide, cold rolls were approximately 20 in. diameter. As the rolls became larger, the arc of contact between the rolls and the strip increased approximately, according to the formula, b=\/Rd where b = the width of contact R = roll radius d = total reduction Now the crushing strength of cold steel of low carbon varies from 70,000 to 100,000 lb. per sq. in. With each succeeding pass the crushing strength increases and may approach 250,000 lb., according to the total reduction. The total reduction in cold rolling of low-carbon steel will range from 40 to 70 per cent of the original thickness, usually in about three or four passes. On this basis, assuming a reduction of 20 per cent in one pass, the crushing strength of steel assumed at 120,000 lb., we have a total pressure between rolls, which (assuming that the rolls do not deform) equals: Roll Strip Strip Diameter, Width, Thickness, In. In. In. Pounds 10 10 0.100 380,000 20 20 0.100 1,080,000 30 36 0.100 2,375,000 42 50 0.100 3,900,000 These figures are approximate, but you will note that in increasing the width five times, or 50 in., the total pressure between the rolls increased approximately ten times. In other words, the pressure per inch of width increased from 38,000 to 78,000 lb. for the same per-centage of reduction.
Citation
APA:
(1928) Backed-up Mills for Continuous RollingMLA: Backed-up Mills for Continuous Rolling. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1928.