Benchmarking versus Test Work - How Should You Manage Process Risk?

- Organization:
- The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Pages:
- 4
- File Size:
- 107 KB
- Publication Date:
- May 24, 2012
Abstract
Most aspects of process design are best addressed via bench scale or pilot plant scale test work. However, as experience is gained, fundamental or indicative data can provide more than adequate information to manage the risk associated with some process aspects of concentrator design.Historical precedence exists where minimal design test work has resulted in successful projects. On many occasions benchmarking, sometimes supported by fundamental data such as mineralogy, has been used to successfully develop effective process plant outcomes. Of course, this style of approach is most common with æfast trackÆ projects and often comes with the usual surprises that result from inadequate geometallurgy to define the project cash flow.This paper explores the risks and opportunities associated with the various facets of process development and design for a base metals concentrator. The paper is intended to provide guidance to project managers rather than address the technical aspects of process engineering.CITATION:Lane, G, Whittering, R and Jeffery, D, 2012. Benchmarking versus test work - How should you manage process risk?, in Proceedings Project Evaluation 2012 , pp 49-52 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
Citation
APA:
(2012) Benchmarking versus Test Work - How Should You Manage Process Risk?MLA: Benchmarking versus Test Work - How Should You Manage Process Risk?. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2012.