Berwind Decision: Where Are We Now With Liability For Contract Miners

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
M. M. Rajkovich
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
6
File Size:
452 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 2003

Abstract

Just prior to the close of the century, the Mine Safety and Health Review Commission issued its long-awaited decision in Berwind Natural Resources et al. vs. Secretary of Labor[1] to usher in the new millennium. The case arose as a result of a mine explosion in Eastern Kentucky resulting in the US Mine Safety and Health Administration's (MSHA) issuance of 225 citations, not only to the contractor but to four affiliated entities of Berwind Corp. While an Administrative Law Judge dismissed citations to three of the four Berwind entities, MSHA and the remaining Berwind entity appealed the case to the commission. Although the commission effectively left intact the administrative law judge's decision, it announced a new theory of liability that would apparently be applied in the future, namely the unitary operator theory.
Citation

APA: M. M. Rajkovich  (2003)  Berwind Decision: Where Are We Now With Liability For Contract Miners

MLA: M. M. Rajkovich Berwind Decision: Where Are We Now With Liability For Contract Miners. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2003.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account