Bridgeport Paper - Magnesia and Sulphur in Blast-Furnace Cinder (see Discussion, p. 889)

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Frank Firmstone
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
8
File Size:
294 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1895

Abstract

In the Kaernthner Zeitschrift, No. 2, 1881, p. 53, et seq., Prof. Ledebur details some experiments on the power of various silicates of lime and alumina, magnesia and alumina, and lime, magnesia and alumina, to remove sulphur from pig-iron, from which it appears (as has long been recognized in practice) that the more basic the silicate the greater the quantity of sulphur it will take up; but also that for the same grade of silicate, this quantity is greatest for the lime-alumina silicate and least for the magnesia-alumina silicate, the lime-magnesia-alumina silicate occupying an intermediate position, and he concluded therefrom (p. 59) that, for the production of pig-iron low in sulphur, pure limestones are to be preferred to those containing magnesia. Much the same opinion has been published elsewhere on high authority, and lately (not to multiply references) by Sir Lowthian
Citation

APA: Frank Firmstone  (1895)  Bridgeport Paper - Magnesia and Sulphur in Blast-Furnace Cinder (see Discussion, p. 889)

MLA: Frank Firmstone Bridgeport Paper - Magnesia and Sulphur in Blast-Furnace Cinder (see Discussion, p. 889). The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1895.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account