Bridgeport Paper - Magnesia and Sulphur in Blast-Furnace Cinder (see Discussion, p. 889)

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 8
- File Size:
- 294 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1895
Abstract
In the Kaernthner Zeitschrift, No. 2, 1881, p. 53, et seq., Prof. Ledebur details some experiments on the power of various silicates of lime and alumina, magnesia and alumina, and lime, magnesia and alumina, to remove sulphur from pig-iron, from which it appears (as has long been recognized in practice) that the more basic the silicate the greater the quantity of sulphur it will take up; but also that for the same grade of silicate, this quantity is greatest for the lime-alumina silicate and least for the magnesia-alumina silicate, the lime-magnesia-alumina silicate occupying an intermediate position, and he concluded therefrom (p. 59) that, for the production of pig-iron low in sulphur, pure limestones are to be preferred to those containing magnesia. Much the same opinion has been published elsewhere on high authority, and lately (not to multiply references) by Sir Lowthian
Citation
APA:
(1895) Bridgeport Paper - Magnesia and Sulphur in Blast-Furnace Cinder (see Discussion, p. 889)MLA: Bridgeport Paper - Magnesia and Sulphur in Blast-Furnace Cinder (see Discussion, p. 889). The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1895.