Chattanooga Paper - Sulphur in Gaseous Fuels

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 3
- File Size:
- 108 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1909
Abstract
The difference between blast-furnace gas and ordinary producer-gas is chiefly that blast-furnace ga,s is higher in CO2 and lower in hydrocprbons and hydrogen, as is shown in Table I. Table I.— Volume-Composition of Producer-Gas and Blast-Furnace Gas. Producer-Gas. Blast-Furnace Gas. Per Cent. Per Cent. (Volume.) (Volume.) CO......22 to 33 25.5 CO2........ 6 to 3 13.0 H...13 to 7 1.5 CH4........ 3 to 1.5 0.0 N..54 to 60 60.0 If natural gas, water-gas, or by-product coke-oven gas be available, blast-furnace gas can be made to resemble very closely in calorific value the average producer-gas by merely mixing in one of these products, which are richer in hydrocarbons and hydrogen. Blast-furnace gas, however, possesses a virtue which is sometimes absent in producer-gas, especially with coals very high in sulphur—namely, that blast-furnace gas is relatively free from sulphur. In some regions the sulphur in coal is an acute problem, and it is highly desirable to find uses for the mine-products which are specially high in sulphur-content. An advantage would be gained if the coal were coked before charging into the gas-producers, but this adds to the expense. Sulphur may be partly eliminated from coal by washing it, the success depending upon the form in which the sulphur occurs, and upon the efficiency of the washer, but it cannot always be removed to the extent desired at most American plants. It is not practicable to remove all the sulphur from producer-gas by washing it, though Mr. Reinhardt, of Germany,
Citation
APA:
(1909) Chattanooga Paper - Sulphur in Gaseous FuelsMLA: Chattanooga Paper - Sulphur in Gaseous Fuels. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1909.