Chicago Paper - The Consumption of Fuel in the Taylor Gas-Producer Plants at the Aspen and Marsac Mills Compared (See Discussion p. 585)

It will be of interest to compare the statistics of the gas-producer plant at Aspen, Colorado (recorded by Mr. W. S. Morse in a paper read at the Montreal Meeting, February, 1893*), with those at the Marsac mill, Park City, Utah, where such a plant was first introduced by the writer in July, 1890. In both mills a Stetefeldt furnace is used for roasting; but the Marsac mill has the old-fidsdshioned revolving dryers, while at Aspen, shelf-dryers are at hand. At Aspen, separate Taylor-producers are provided for the Stetefeldt furnace and the shelf-dryers; at the Marsac mill one 7-foot producer supplies gas to both the furnace and the dryers. Hence, in the latter case, the quantity of coal consumed for each apparatus can only be estimated, based upon the relative consumption of wood before gas was introduced. According to Mr. Wilson's statement, the relative consumption of wood in the Stetefeldt furnace and the revolving dryers was as 3 to 2. In the year 1892 the Marsac mill put through the dryers and the Stetefeldt furnace the following quantities of ore and salt (approximate dry weights) : ore, 22,800 tons; salt, 2262 tons. There were consumed in the Taylor-producer 2,714 tons of Rock Springs coal. We may thus make the comparative estimate as follows: Table Showing the Consumption of Coal per Ton Of Ore and Salt at the Marsac and Aspen Mills. Marsac. Aspen. Difference. Pounds. Pounds. Pounds. Drying ore and salt,.... 86.63 72.22 14.41 Roasting ore,.....142.40 117.44 24.96 Total,.....229.03 189.66 39.37 In making a just comparison a number of items must be taken