Choosing a Water Collector for Matte Separation

The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
McLaughlin JD Robertson GE
Organization:
The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Pages:
8
File Size:
204 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1993

Abstract

An extensive laboratory campaign was conducted to find a suitable water soluble collector to replace diphenylguanidine (DPG) in the matte separation process. The examination of the collectors was done by measuring the rate of flotation and the best candidate collectors were selected on the basis of the rate parameters. As a result of this search mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) was selected for a plant trial. A plant trial of two weeks duration confirmed that MBT will produce separations at least as good as those obtained with DPG.
Citation

APA: McLaughlin JD Robertson GE  (1993)  Choosing a Water Collector for Matte Separation

MLA: McLaughlin JD Robertson GE Choosing a Water Collector for Matte Separation. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1993.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account