Comparison Of California And Turkish Colemanites ? Introduction

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 10
- File Size:
- 360 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1973
Abstract
In our comparison of California and Turkish colemanites, we should first place the discussion in context. In order to exclude technical considerations, which are not germane to this paper, we must make the manifest and basic observation that if colemanite were not acceptable for the production of glass products it would not be used, and we would not be interested in this comparison at all. Suffice it to say that the colemanites, being calcium borates, provide a necessary flux in glass manu¬facture, together with the requisite degree of physical strength and chemical durability which can be achieved only by the use in glass of a. flux substanti¬ally free from alkali; so the sodium borates are automatically excluded from the production of textile fibers. Thus we have today under consideration only California colemanite, Turkish cole mite, and, because it provides a degree of competition to both, ABA, or anhy¬drous boric acid, which, although it is a refined intermediate and of much higher cost, it is also of a much higher degree of purity, and its characteristics can easily be modified to produce a desired end product, so we must include it in any consideration of high quality borates. [Calcim Borate Pentahydrate] Colemanite is a [calcium pentahydrate,] with the formula Ca2B6011.5H20. It has a theoretical B203 content of 50.8%.
Citation
APA:
(1973) Comparison Of California And Turkish Colemanites ? IntroductionMLA: Comparison Of California And Turkish Colemanites ? Introduction. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1973.