Compatibility Of Sinter/Pellet Burdens ? Introduction

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
J. O?Hanlon
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
21
File Size:
2016 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1983

Abstract

The 4500 m3 blast furnace at the Redcar Works of ESC operates or, a burden of sinter and pellets, both materials being produced within the works. The early history of the furnace was given to the AIME Ironmaking Conference in 1981(1) when the burden was 65% superfluxed minter and 33% acid pellets. While ironmaking performance was adequate, it was felt that there were advantages to be gained by the use of fluxed pellets. For example, Kobe Steel had reported (2) that the rise of 30-50% dolomite fluxed pellets had enabled them to achieve better furnace permeability, higher gas utilisation, and enhanced ore/coke ratios. It appeared probable to BSC that the use of magnesia-bearing fluxed pellets would give a burden which had compatibility of softening and melting properties, i.e., fluxed sinter and dolomite pellets would result in a thinner cohesive zone because of closer matching of softening and melting temperatures, with consequential benefits on furnace stability and efficiency.
Citation

APA: J. O?Hanlon  (1983)  Compatibility Of Sinter/Pellet Burdens ? Introduction

MLA: J. O?Hanlon Compatibility Of Sinter/Pellet Burdens ? Introduction. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1983.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account