Crushing And Grinding Practices Vary But Autogenous Grinding Continues To Gain Adherents

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Bertrand Robinson
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
3
File Size:
287 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1970

Abstract

Epitomized, there have been no innovations recently in crushing, but in grinding the trend has been towards larger units under more automatic control with an increased use of autogenous grinding. Crushing Portability of primary crushers to "follow the face" reduces material handling costs. The top size of crusher feed still establishes the size of the crusher; the feed opening should be 1 1/2 times the size of the largest feed. The maximum size of crusher product is 1 ½ times the open scale setting of a jaw or gyratory crusher. Practice dictates use of scalping screens ahead of any type of crusher when the feed contains 25% or more of product size. If required capacity is under 600-700 tph economics favor a double toggle crusher or an impactor. For larger capacities the gyratory crusher is favored.
Citation

APA: Bertrand Robinson  (1970)  Crushing And Grinding Practices Vary But Autogenous Grinding Continues To Gain Adherents

MLA: Bertrand Robinson Crushing And Grinding Practices Vary But Autogenous Grinding Continues To Gain Adherents. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1970.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account