Discussion – Design of Grinding Balls – Technical Papers, MINING ENGINEERING, Vol. 41, No.9, September 1989, pp.951-955 – Dunn, D. J.

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 1
- File Size:
- 78 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1990
Abstract
Dunn has written an excellent paper providing a wealth of advice on what is often the most costly consumable in the mineral processing plant. As he pointed out, grinding media selection and quality control can play a major role in successful plant operation. Owing to the economic importance of this topic, there are some important factors related to media sizing that I believe merit further comment. Dunn made reference to a slightly simplified version of the Azzaroni (1981) equation and pointed out its successful use for the Henderson SAG and Climax ball mills. Although both formulas are empirically based on successful plant experience, a notable discrepancy between them is that Bond has factored the work index by the ore specific gravity. This is invariably so, as the Bond work index is derived from the mass grindability (in grams per revolution) measured in a test mill with a fixed volume of solids load (Bond, 1961). A material having the same structural integrity but double the density of another will have double the grindability and just over half the work index. Thus, for the general case, specific gravity should be incorporated into any media sizing formulation that uses work index as the criterion for resistance to breakage.
Citation
APA: (1990) Discussion – Design of Grinding Balls – Technical Papers, MINING ENGINEERING, Vol. 41, No.9, September 1989, pp.951-955 – Dunn, D. J.
MLA: Discussion – Design of Grinding Balls – Technical Papers, MINING ENGINEERING, Vol. 41, No.9, September 1989, pp.951-955 – Dunn, D. J.. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1990.