Discussion of Papers Published Prior to 1954 - The Use of Wooden Rock Bolts in the Day Mines (1953) 196, P. 922

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Rollin Farmin Carville E. Sparks
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
2
File Size:
181 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1955

Abstract

Edward Thomas (U.S. Bureau of Mines, Washington, D. C.)—This excellent article on an ingenious and successful installation of wooden rock bolts loses much of its effectiveness through an attempt by the authors to establish the general adaptability of this type of support. Possibly because they have only local experience as a guide, they imply erroneously in the first paragraph that the Bureau of Mines has been opposed to wooden bolting, although later in the article reference is made to a Bureau publication on the subject. In 1947 the Bureau of Mines decided to sponsor experiments in roof bolting in coal mines because the experience of the St. Joseph Lead Co. had indicated that this type of roof support appeared to be a roof-fall accident-prevention measure that might be adopted and also effect economies in operating cost. Justification for this belief has been borne out, particularly in coal mining. This program has been carried out under the following general program: 1—The Roof Control Section of the Bureau of Mines has advocated and initiated underground experiments under controlled conditions with many different ideas related to rock bolting since 1947. In no instance has cooperation in developing an idea been refused, no matter how ridiculous it may have seemed at first glance, if it has been requested by a mining company. 2—The Bureau of Mines has no police powers over the selection of roof-support devices and seeks none. 3—At the request of an operator, the Bureau of Mines will make comparative tests on various types of bolts underground and will submit resultant data for the operator's consideration. 4—Wherever possible, the Bureau publicizes successful installations, so that others may benefit from this experience; however, it is careful not to discriminate between manufacturers of bolts or bolt-installation equipment. Unsuccessful experiments probably should also be publicized, but from a practical standpoint it is usually not feasible. In other words, the role of the Roof Control Section of the Bureau is in line with the original purpose for which the Bureau was first organized: to serve industry through gathering, analyzing, and disseminating factual data. It would seem to be logical that the starting point for any experimentation on roof bolts in coal mines should be the time-proved practice of the
Citation

APA: Rollin Farmin Carville E. Sparks  (1955)  Discussion of Papers Published Prior to 1954 - The Use of Wooden Rock Bolts in the Day Mines (1953) 196, P. 922

MLA: Rollin Farmin Carville E. Sparks Discussion of Papers Published Prior to 1954 - The Use of Wooden Rock Bolts in the Day Mines (1953) 196, P. 922. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1955.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account