Discussion - Precision Survey For Tunnel Control - Mining Engineering, Page 977, September 1958, AIME Trans., Vol. 214 – Donald, Douglas D.

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
C. J. Barber
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
2
File Size:
204 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 7, 1959

Abstract

This paper Donald describes how New Jersey Zinc Co. made surveys for a connection between the Ivanhoe and Van Mater shafts at Austinville, Va. Except to say that the two faces had to meet "accurately" on line and grade, Donald does not indicate the required precision. Assuming that there were 24 angles in the 1 ½ -mile traverse and 15 in the one-mile traverse, it can be shown that if the average error in plumbing each shaft was ±30" and the average error in measuring each traverse angle was ±10", then the average error at the point of connection would have been about ±1.9 ft normal to the line between the shafts. This calculation assumes that any errors in the triangulation would be negligible compared with the errors in the plumbings and traverses, and it also neglects taping errors. With no constant errors or blunders, the latter would be important only in lines normal to the line between the shafts.
Citation

APA: C. J. Barber  (1959)  Discussion - Precision Survey For Tunnel Control - Mining Engineering, Page 977, September 1958, AIME Trans., Vol. 214 – Donald, Douglas D.

MLA: C. J. Barber Discussion - Precision Survey For Tunnel Control - Mining Engineering, Page 977, September 1958, AIME Trans., Vol. 214 – Donald, Douglas D.. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1959.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account