Discussions of Papers Published Prior to July 1960 - The Gem Stocks and Adjacent Orebodies, Coeur d'Alene District, Idaho; AIME Trans, 1959, vol 214, page 697; see also AIME Trans, 1960, vol 217, page 117

Hugh E. McKinstry (Professor of Geology, Laboratory of Mining Geology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.) Pre-Cambrian age for the Coeur d'Alene mineralization, as indicated by isotope studies and recently discussed by Silverman, Long, and Kulp' would explain some features of the mineralogy of the district that have long been a puzzle. In the Silver Belt, especially in the Sunshine mine, lead-zinc min erali zation passes downward into tetrahedrite ore. Although commercially speaking this is a rich silver zone, the silver is, quantitatively, a mere impurity amounting to a small fraction of 1 pct. In effect the zonal change is from lead-zinc down into copper mineralization—-the usual zonal change that occurs in many districts. In the Burke-Mullan portion of the district, on the other hand, lead-zinc ore does not pass downward into copper mineralization of the Sunshine type. Instead, pyrrhotite appears in depth while the tenor in lead and zinc declines. The change occurs at increasingly greater depth away from the Gem stocks, deepening irregularly by some 3000 ft within two to four miles. As noted by Crosby, biotite, grunerite, and garnet appear in the deep zone. The marked difference between this apparent zonal change and the more nomal change to a copper zone is quite explainable if already existing pre-Cambrian veins have been locally metamorphosed by a Tertiary intrusive. The chief obstacle to this explanation is the evidence that mineralization cuts Laramide intrusives, but evidence on this point is conflicting as indicated by Crosby's observations and summary. This is not the first instance of a problem in determining the time-relationship of mineralization to a spatially associated intrusive. At the Noranda mine veins of chalcopyrite extend into a diabase dike which apparently cuts the ore, although Price2 concludes that the ore is later. However, at the Normetal mine diabase of a similar dike is thought3 to intrude the orebody but is cut by stringers of chalcopyrite. In the Sullivan Mine, B. C.,4 galena follows a fracture in a larnprophyre dike which, itself, cuts the main orebody. In the Sudbury district dikes of olivine diabase are clearly younger than the nickel ore, yet where they cut the Creighton orebody they contain stringers of chalcopyrite. In the laboratory, Hawley5 has developed veinlets of sulfide (chalcopyrite) it] silicate gangue by heating specimens of ore in a stream of H2S at 410 °C. From this and other evidernce. it seems clear that sulfides can be transferred from one site to another — at least through short distances — at temperatures well below their melting points. It would seem then that even if sulfide Mineralization in the Gem stocks can be shown unequ ivocably to be later than the intrusive the possibility of "remobiliza tion" need not be more than local. Thus the zonal relationships are quite in accord with a pre-Cambrian age for original deposition of the lead, zinc, copper, silver, and uranium in the Coeur d'Alene district. REFERENCES 1. A. Silverman, A. Long, and J. L. Kulp: Discussion of: The Gem Stocks and Adjacent Orebodies, Coeur d'Alene District, Idaho. Mining Engineering, May 1960, pp. 470-471; AME Trans., 1960, vol. 217, p. 117. 2. Peter Price: Geol. & O. D. at the Home Mine, Noranda, Quebec. Can. Inst. M & M Bull 263, 1934, p. 108; also,Trans. CIMM 1939, pp. 108-140. 3. w. L. Brown Nometal Mine in structural Geology of Canadian Ore Deposits, Montreal, 1948, p. 690. 4. C. O. Swanson and H. C. Gunning: Geology of the Sullivan Mine. Can. Inst. Mining & Met. Trans. vol. 48, 1945, p. 653. 5. J. E. Hawley: Heat Effects on Sulphides and Possible Applications. Univ. Toronto Studies, Geol. Ser. No. 46, 1941, p. 34.