Drilling – Equipment, Methods and Materials - A Water Shut-Off Method for Sand-Type Porosity in A...

A test is described in which the wellubility of porous rock is measured as a function of the displacement properties of the rock-water-oil system. Four displacemet operations are carried out: (I) sponlaneous displaceti?ent of water by oil, (2) forced displacement of water by oil oil in the same system using a centrifuging procetllrre, (3) spontaneous displacement of oil by water. and (4) forced displacment of oil by water. Ratios of the spontaneous displacement volumes to the total displucenlent volumes are used as wettability indicates. Cores having clean mineral surfaces (strongly preferentially water-wet) show displacement-by-waler ratios approaching 1.00 and displacement-by-oil ratios of zero. Cores which ([re. strongly preferentinlly oil-wet give the reverse resu1ts. Neutral wellability cores show zero values for both ratios Fresh cores from different oil reservoirs have shown wettabiltties in tlris te.st covering rrlti~ost 111e conlplrtt, range of thr: te.st. Notvever, nlo.s/ of tlle fresh California cores tested were slightly prcfere111icrlly wclter-\vet. The chrrnge.~ in coro u ('liabilities, as indicated hy this te.st, r~.sril/ing from various CO~P hanrlling procedures tt,ere oh.served. In sonie ca.sc,s /Ire ~,cttahilitio.c. of fresh cores were changell by drxi:~g or 11y e.x/rclct ing with iolcreiii~ or. dioxunc~; in o/h~r cases they were 1101 changed. Co~ltrrc/ of cort,.s ~.ith filtrc~t~c. from water-base rlrilling rilrrrls crlrc.sed littlc change in we/ /ahility ivhile contnct with filtrates frorii oil-hus~ ri1rlcl.s tlecrrascrl the prefcrerlcc, of the, cores for )I.NI Usitig thi,s test to ri.crl~lute n~r~ttubili~y, N .vt~ldy was iilarle of /lie correlmtio~i of wettability with wa/erfloocl nil recovery for orttcrop Ohio sand.stone and for Al~ln-tlunl. Resul/.v indicate thml no single correlatioti between these factors applies to different porous rock syste~n. It is thought that diflerences in pore gen~netry resrrlt in diflrrerrce.~ in this correlurio~z. INTRODUCTTON Most investigators who have reported on the wettahility of porous rock have described such rock as prcferentially water-wet or preferentially oil-wet. In some cases a third classification, neutral wettability. has been used. The efficiency of water floods in each of these wettability groups has been described in numerous publications. Several methods for characterizing porous rock wet tability more precisely have been reported,' " but it appears that because of one weakness or another. none of these has been generally accepted. Early in our studies in this field, it was found that the displacement efficiency of oil by water in a particular porous rock having a strong preference for water was quite different from that in a similar rock having only a moderate preference for water. Thus, there appeared to be a need for a practical, reasonably precise wet tability test. one which could classify porous rocks into 10 to 20 different groups rather than the two or three broad groups listed above. The test developed to meet this need is described in this paper. Also, changes in wettability, as indicated hy this test, resulting from various core handling procedures are discussed. Finally, data showing the corrclation of wettability with waterflood oil recovery for two different types of cores are presented and discussed. Some confusion has resulted from the failure of certain writers to define clearly some of the wettability terms they have used. Accordingly, the following commcnts concerning definitions are offered. The wc t ta-hility of a solid surface is the relative preference of that surface to be covered by one of the fluids under consideration. It is felt that this is the generally accepted definition. The fluids being considered must bc specified (or understood) before the term wettability has any significance. In the work reported here these fluids are water (3 per cent brine) and oil (kerosene). The term preferential wettability is sometimes used, but we think that the word preferential is redundant here and should not be used. Tn line with the definitions of Jennings', a preferentially oil-wet solid surface is regarded as a surface which will show an oil advancing contact angle less than 90" (measured through the oil) in the water-oil-solid system. Oil will spontaneously displace water, if both are at the same pressure, from such a surface. A preferentially water-wet surface is analogous. This is consistent with the wettability definition above. As Jennings has said, frequently the term oil-wet is used to mean the same thing as preferentially oil-wet. However, oil-wet also has been used occasionally referring to an oil-covered surface when the availability of water was limited. To avoid confusion from this source, we do not use the terms oil-wet and water-wet. DESCRIPTION OF WETTABTLITY TEST The following points were considered desirable in a wettability test for our purpose. 1. The test should be a displacement test resembling