Easton Paper - Blast-Furnace Slag Cement

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
J. J. Bodmer
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
2
File Size:
71 KB
Publication Date:

Abstract

Although the similarity between puzzolana, or trass, and blastfurnace slag, as seen by comparison of the analyses, is a well-known fact, blast-furnace slag has not been used commercially as a substitute for those cementing materials. The reason, the writer apprehends, lies in the fact that unless such slag is disintegrated or subdivided by rolls, the process must either be too costly, or the material is not in a fit and proper condition for the purpose. In order to produce a reliable slag cement, the slag must be ground together with the lime into an impalpable powder. The subdivided slag must, therefore, be perfectly dry, and, at the same time, friable. The stronger the hydraulic properties of the lime, the more reliable the slag cement will be, and practice has proved, that the slag from a gray-iron furnace gives the best results. The slag cement which has given the results shown in the annexed table, under pressure tests, was composed of six parts of slag, from a blast-furnace producing No. 3 foundry iron, and one part of lime, of medium hydraulic properties. The above-described class of cement bears storing as long as most Portland cements, and the cheapness of its production is self-evident.
Citation

APA: J. J. Bodmer  Easton Paper - Blast-Furnace Slag Cement

MLA: J. J. Bodmer Easton Paper - Blast-Furnace Slag Cement. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers,

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account