Economics Of The Treatment Of Gold Plant Tailings In High Rate Thickeners

Introduction Over the last five years, a large number of small- to medium-sized carbon-in-pulp treatment plants have been built in Australia, most designed to treat between 250,000 t/a and 1.5 Mt/a of ore. Because of the limited capital resources and tight cash-flow positions of these relatively small mining companies, the primary requirement was often to get a plant built and operating in a short period of time and at minimal capital cost. Therefore, since the inclusion of both pre-leach and tailings thickeners represents an obvious and significant capital cost, most of these plants were built without thickeners or even detailed, cost-benefit analyses on their inclusion. In some cases, the increasing use of High Rate Thickeners (HRTs) in the mineral processing industries has, however, resulted in a reassessment, because of their considerably lower cost. This reassessment was triggered primarily by the need to conserve water in arid mining areas where borefields are costly to install and water is limited. With the startup and operation of these installations, the resulting significant savings in cyanide consumption has been recognized, in many situations, as a primary justification for the installation of HRTs. Solution balances Degradation of cyanide occurs in the tailings water discharge to slime dams. The degree of degradation (cyanide loss) in the water recovered depends on a number of factors, but it is usually assumed to be about 90%. The most important mechanisms of CN loss are through HCN losses and oxidation by oxygen in the air, which also assists in the hydrolysis of CN. These mechanisms are supported by the large dam surface area and the long retention time of the tailings water in the dam. By thickening the CIP tailings at the plant and recovering as much tailings water as immediately possible, these losses are avoided. The retention time in an HRT is less than three hours, and the surface area is relatively small. Therefore, CN losses are negligible, which is not necessarily the case in conventionally-sized thickeners. Fig. I shows a block diagram of a 100-t/h gold plant without a thickener. In this example, 50% of the tailings water pumped to the tailings dam is recovered, and the CN concentration of the returned water is 10% of the tailings CN concentration of 150 ppm. Fig. 2 represents a plant with an HRT on tailings, thickening to 55% w/w solids. In this case, the thickened tailings are pumped to the dam, and 25% of the contained water is recovered. The recovered water and the mill make-up water are not sent directly to the mill; instead, they are added to the thickener feed and mixed with it prior to thickening. By doing this, the tailings are effectively washed, and the additional cyanide is recovered. Solution balances over these two circuits show cyanide recoveries of 5% and 65%, respectively. Thus, the thickener use increases cyanide recovery by 60%. Fig. 3 shows a two-stage HRT circuit in a countercurrent decantation (CCD) configuration. In this example, an additional 13% of cyanide is recovered through the use of the second-stage unit. This configuration can be justified when residual cyanide levels are high. Capital and operating costs - Case study 1 Illustrative cost figures are based on a CIP tailings thickener installed, in early 1988, as part of Dominion Mining's treatment plant at Paddy's Flat near Meekatharra. (All costs within this paper, unless stated otherwise, are in Australian dollars.) [Assumptions: Feed rate 150 t/h Ore moisture content 5% Leach density 40% solids Underflow density 55% solids Residual cyanide in tailings 150 g/m3 Flocculant dosage 15 g/t Consumable costs: Water $ 0.40/m3 Cyanide$ 2.00/kg Flocculant$ 4.50/kg Power$ 0.12/kWh Length of tailings pipeline2,500 m Capital costs of the major items involved in the thickener installation are given below: Thickener unit, 15-m diam $ 230,000 Water return pumps 12,000 Water recirculation pumps 28,000 Feed box 5,000 Flocculant make-up system 18,000 Flocculant storage tank and dosing pumps 11,000 Piping and valves 85,000 Electrics and instruments 47,000 Civil works 29,000 Installation 69,000 Total cost$ 534,000] Savings in capital costs that can be attributed to the