Extractive Metallurgy Division - Electrolytic Zinc Plant at Monsanto, Illinois

THE electrolytic zinc plant of the American Zinc Co. of Illinois was described by Davidson' in 1944. Since then, improvements as well as expansion of the plant facilities have been made. In order to increase the production of high grade zinc which was needed for war purposes, an expansion program designed to double the slab zinc capacity was started in 1942 and completed in March 1943. This expansion was propagated by a contract between the American Zinc Co. of Ill. and the Defense Plant Corp. The contract included the facilities of the Fairmont City, Ill., property of the American Zinc Co., where a suspension-type roaster with contact acid plant, cadmium distillation furnace, Waelz oxide and densifying plant, and horizontal retort furnaces were installed. The expanded Monsanto, Ill., plant and the additional facilities of' the Fairmont plant were designed to integrate the metallurgical treatment of zinc concentrates for the production of special high grade zinc at Monsanto with the production of acid, cadmium, high grade zinc from furnace skimmings and the Waelz treatment of leach residue at Fairmont. In general, the original flowsheet was not changed, except for the addition of the filtering, drying and reclaiming of leach residue, and the treatment of purification cake for the recovery of copper, cadmium sponge, and zinc. Fig. 1 is a flow diagram of present operations. The original plant facilities, desi-gned for 50 tons daily production of slab zinc, had some units which were more than adequate. Therefore, in expanding the facilities to 100 tons per day, it was not necessary to double all operating components. Table I gives the comparison of the changes made in the unit operating components for the original facilities, 1941, the 1943 expansion, and the 1951 facilities. During the past 11 years a number of improvenients have been made resulting in: 1—an increase in slab production, 2—higher recoveries on the calcine treated, 3—better quality of slab zinc produced, 4—higher current efficiencies, and 5—less man hours Table I. Changes in Operating Facilities Operating Unit 1941 1943 1951 Calcine unloading (pneumatic), 10 tons per hr 12 calcine unloading track hpr. and elev., 60 tons per hr 1 Calcine storage, tons 1,000 2,000 2,000 Leach tanks, 35 vol. tons. No. 3 5 6 slurry mixing 6x6 ft stainless tank, No. 1 Ball mill. 4.5 rt x 16 in. conical. No. 1 CLassifier duplex, No. 1 1 Thickeners. 50 it diam. No. 2 9 2 Filter thickeners, sq ft '-- Moore filters, sq ft 5.760 11,520 Drum filters, 10 ft diam x 16 ft, No. 3 3 Rotary arlers, No. 1 2 1st stage Cu-As purificatlon tank. 90 vol. tons, No. 3 Solution heaters, No. 3 Filter press, 30x30 bronze, No. 4 Zinc dust purification tanks, 45 vol tons. No. 3 5 4 Filter press, 36x36 bronze, No. 3 5 3 Cadmium recovery plant: Process tank. No. 5 2 Cake roaster, 20 ft diam x 4 hearth. No. 1 Filter press, 24x24, No. 4 1 Sponge wash box, 4x6 ft, No. 1 Evaporative cooling unit (vacuum), No. 1 Purified storage tank, vol. tons 400 400 400 Cell acid storage, vol. tons 400 400 400 Electrolytic cells, No. 180 372 372 Cell room ventilation, cu ft per min 35,000 125,000 125,000 Cell cooling water. gal per min 1,500 2,300 2,300 Deep well 16 in. x 95 ft, 1500 gal per min, No. 2 3 3 Melting and casting furnace, 130 ton. No. I Furnace fume scrubber unit, No. 1 Dross drums, No. 2 Dross roaster, 8 ft diam x 8 hearth, No. 1 Electrolysis power conversion, kw 6,250 23,750 23,750 Power transformers, 13,800/440, kva 1,000 1,500 2,000 Steam boilers fire tube, 15 psi, lb per hr 12,000 18,000 18,000 Steam boilers water tube. 125 psi, Ib per hr 30,000 Air compressor, 2 stage. 300 cu ft per min. 100 psi, No. 1 2 Air compressor, 1 stage, 300 cu ft per min, 20 psi, No. 1 Vacuum pumps, 18x7, 720 cu ft per day, No. - - . Vacuum pumps, 24x11, 1.633 cu ft per day, No. 3 3 Building area, sq ft 60,854 113,568 115,000 per ton of metal produced. In the summer of 1944, the "reverse" leaching process was placed in operation and since it has been described,' no further description will be given. Other facilities and changes which have contributed to the process improvements were the scrubbing of fume from the melting and