Feed of Wilfley Type Tables - Results of Concentrating Classified Feed, Screen-Sized Feed, and Natural Feed

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
ERNEST W. ELLIS
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
2
File Size:
191 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1926

Abstract

MORE or less contradictory findings as to the most satisfactory feed for concentration tables of the Wilfley type is shown by the diversity of opinion among experimenters. Prof. R. H. Richards,l as a result of his work, favors classification. On the other hand the work of Messrs. Cox, Gibbins, and Porter,' of McGill University, points in general to the desirability of screen-sized feed The ore used was obtained from the West mill of the Bunker Hill and Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Co., Kellogg, Idaho, and consisted of argentiferous galena in a gangue of quartzite and siderite. The natural feed was taken from the launder supplying the Fahrenwald classifier. Classified feed was collected from each of the ten spigots of this same classifier. From the natural feed the screen-sized feed was pre- pared in the laboratory. All three types of table feed were therefore derived from the actual mill circuit of a large plant.
Citation

APA: ERNEST W. ELLIS  (1926)  Feed of Wilfley Type Tables - Results of Concentrating Classified Feed, Screen-Sized Feed, and Natural Feed

MLA: ERNEST W. ELLIS Feed of Wilfley Type Tables - Results of Concentrating Classified Feed, Screen-Sized Feed, and Natural Feed. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1926.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account