Foreign Mineral Development: Should We Retreat?

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 12
- File Size:
- 684 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1975
Abstract
Three years ago, at a reception given during the Steel Institute meeting in New York, I heard the remark, "A new formula must be found for foreign investment." This was immediately following the takeover of U. S. Steel's Matilde operation in Bolivia. Recently, at the World Mining Congress in Lima, Peru, the subject of foreign investment was still a lively topic of conversation. The nationalization of the copper mines in Chile and recent trends in the "Third World" have made all but a few extremely wary of investment anywhere other than in the ?stable? countries. Now, the fallibility of this philosophy has been demonstrated in such "stable" countries as Canada, Australia, and Ireland. Yet, nationalization is not new to us. The events in Chile were classified as disastrous to the affected companies, but so were the effects of nationalization to the majors in Bolivia in 1952. Mexicanization of the mining industry in Mexico was considered impractical by many. Now, those who accepted it are finding it to be workable.
Citation
APA:
(1975) Foreign Mineral Development: Should We Retreat?MLA: Foreign Mineral Development: Should We Retreat?. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1975.