Fuel cell versus diesel loader operation: Cost-benefit analysis study (6b80a653-d0e2-439c-a343-5c05fb591d61)

Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
M. C. Bétournay P. Laliberté R. Lacroix S. Hardcastle G. Desrivières P. Mousset-Jones G. Righettini
Organization:
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Pages:
15
File Size:
3767 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 2005

Abstract

"Under the requirement to define the economic advantages of using hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, a broad-scoped project was initiated to quantify the costs associated with operating fuel cell vehicles and diesel vehicles. While ventilation savings are clearly an advantage for the former, a complete and detailed analysis of this and other operational and capital cost elements was undertaken in order to provide the mining industry with factual information in considering the changeover from one technology to another.This paper outlines the results of the investigations to date defining the costs/benefits associated with capital purchases, operations (electrical/diesel, mine air heating fuel, ventilation, openings, surface and underground infrastructure, maintenance, labour, etc.), delivery of energy, regulatory obligations, and mine production. Considerations are given to the type and size of a mining operation, the depth, and location in North America.Significant ventilation power, equipment, and infrastructure savings are possible with the application of fuel cells for shallower mine applications. At depth, where heat is an issue, there is a reduction in benefit. Specific qualifiers such as minimum air velocities, dust dilution, shaft, and heating system velocity limits must be considered on an individual mine basis. While the capital cost for fuel cell mining equipment is currently higher than diesel versions the high cost of fuel cells is anticipated to be reduced significantly in the near future with the intensification of manufacturing. In either case, the operational savings would probably be sufficient to balance the supplementary capitalization costs.Comprehensive reports have been issued."
Citation

APA: M. C. Bétournay P. Laliberté R. Lacroix S. Hardcastle G. Desrivières P. Mousset-Jones G. Righettini  (2005)  Fuel cell versus diesel loader operation: Cost-benefit analysis study (6b80a653-d0e2-439c-a343-5c05fb591d61)

MLA: M. C. Bétournay P. Laliberté R. Lacroix S. Hardcastle G. Desrivières P. Mousset-Jones G. Righettini Fuel cell versus diesel loader operation: Cost-benefit analysis study (6b80a653-d0e2-439c-a343-5c05fb591d61). Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 2005.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account