History and Trend of Mining at Climax - Displacement of Chute-and-Grizzly System By Slusher Method Is Most Notable Advance

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 5
- File Size:
- 767 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1946
Abstract
IN the early days of Colorado mining, between 1880 and 1900, when Leadville, Kokomo, and Robinson were boom mining camps, the entire area around Climax for a matter of fifteen miles was overrun with prospectors, so the mineralized outcrop at Climax was not unknown. The principal interest in minerals during this period was in gold, silver, and lead, and since the Climax outcrop showed none of these it drew little attention. Geology played an important part in bringing prospectors to the very edge of the Climax deposit. The Mosquito fault, which crosses near the base of Bartlett Mountain, continues as an important geological structure, at least as far as Leadville some twelve miles distant, and at the base of Bartlett Mountain the vertical throw on the fault is estimated to be between 2000 and 5000 ft. The sedimentary beds known to the Leadville district are all present on Bartlett Mountain to the north of the Mosquito fault, which cuts them off abruptly, and exposes the Pre-Cambrian rocks that underlaid them, so the prospectors, who were searching for gold, silver, and lead in the sediments
Citation
APA:
(1946) History and Trend of Mining at Climax - Displacement of Chute-and-Grizzly System By Slusher Method Is Most Notable AdvanceMLA: History and Trend of Mining at Climax - Displacement of Chute-and-Grizzly System By Slusher Method Is Most Notable Advance. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1946.