How The Geologist Can Prevent A Geostatistical Study From Running Out Of Control: Some Suggestions

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Jean-Michel Rendu D. E. Ranta
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
8
File Size:
456 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1992

Abstract

It is generally recognized that geologic input is required for the results of a geostatistical study to be meaningful. However the link between geology and geostatistics is often complex and not well understood. A geostatistical evaluation can be divided into four phases: Background discussions, computation, reserve reporting and reserve audit. Each one of these phases is described, as well as the role the geologist should play during their completion. This role will vary depending on the geology of the deposit being studied, the geostatistical method chosen and the computer hardware and software being used. The geologist's acceptance of the results is needed if the geostatistical model is to have any credibility. The most significant obstacle to a meaningful study comes from the difficulties geologists and geostatisticians often encounter when attempting to communicate with each other.
Citation

APA: Jean-Michel Rendu D. E. Ranta  (1992)  How The Geologist Can Prevent A Geostatistical Study From Running Out Of Control: Some Suggestions

MLA: Jean-Michel Rendu D. E. Ranta How The Geologist Can Prevent A Geostatistical Study From Running Out Of Control: Some Suggestions. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1992.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account