Infrastructure for Mining, Mineral Processing and Associated Urban Development

- Organization:
- The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Pages:
- 18
- File Size:
- 314 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1974
Abstract
In this paper, a subtle, but important, difference has been drawn between responsibility and mandate. Responsibility has a connotation of financial involvement assigned to an organ- isation as a result of some action it takes, the ramifications of which can be ascribed directly to the organisation. In contrast mandate relates to the power and authority to act. The paper outlines the role of poli- ticians as community decision-makers and the need for Government policy to be flexible in an advanced industrial society so that decision- making options are kept open for as long as necessary. Further, broad community objectives need to be understood and defined so that plans and policies can be consistent. Co-ordination through communication at all levels, especially at the public administration interfaces and with the private sector,is essential for effective resource allocation and efficient implementation. The paper discusses several aspects of the infrastructure responsibility question and some considerations which might be viewed as important by the community decision-makers in considering what responsibility the "community" should accept in providing infrastructure.
Citation
APA: (1974) Infrastructure for Mining, Mineral Processing and Associated Urban Development
MLA: Infrastructure for Mining, Mineral Processing and Associated Urban Development. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1974.