Institute of Metals Division - Effect of Manganese on the Austenite-Pearlite Transformation

Measurements of rate of growth, thermodymmic quantities, and partitioning of Mn are reported for high-purity eutectoid Fe-C and Fe-C-Mn steels for the auistenite-pearlite reaction. Evaluztion of the cotnstants of a derived-rate equation with these data indicate that Mn additions cause the decrease observed by increasivg the activation energy and apparent activation entropy or the movenment of complexes at the interface. A diffusion-controlled mechanism is not required. Appreciable partitioning of Mn to cementite occurs entirely behind the austenite-pearlite interface for more than 30°C of subcooling. ThE growth of pearlite from austenite has been extensively studied over a period of years. but the rate-controlling step in the process is not known nor is the mechanisrn of the effect of alloying elements understood. A comprehensive review of the subject has been given by Mehl and Hagel. The present study has been concerned with further considerations of the effects of alloying elements on the rate of growth of pearlite. Analytical relatioriships for the rate of growth of pearlite have been considered by Zener.2 Turnbull,3 Machlin,4 Cahn.5 Frye,6 and Frye et a1.7 The derived expressions in each case involve the free energy of the transformation. the interlamellar spacing. and some rate term of the nature of the diffusion coefficient. mobility or frequency of occurrence of some rate-determining step. The treatments. of course. differ in detail. Further consideration is given in the present paper to the equation of Frye, Stansbury. and McElroy which was derived from modified absolute rate theory without in any way specifying the mechanism of the reaction. This equation is r=c ? T ? F exp -?E*/RT [1] where r = rate of growth in mm/sec c = a constant AT = equilibrium transformation temperature minus actual transformation temperature "C ?F = free energy per mol of austenite minus that of pearlite ?E* = activation energy R= gas constant ?F in Eq. [1] is computed from the following: ?F=?H?T/To - ?T' dT' ?T' ?CdT"/T" [2] To To where AH is the enthalpy per mol of austenite minus that of pearlite at the equilibrium temperature, To, and AC is the difference in specific heat between austenite and pearlite per mol. Subsequently, Darken, Fisher, and Galligan8 have reported that a layer of ferrite separates pearlite from austenite at the growing interface (i,e., the advancing face of Fe3C is in contact with ferrite, not austenite) and the ratio of the thickness of this layer to the spacing of the pearlite has not been found to vary with alloy content or transformation temperature. This observation does not require any alteration in the above equation: however, it may require that a different significance be attached to the factor, AT. The AT term appears in Eq. [I] as a consequence of a factor for the amount of growth per complex transformed at the interface.* It is based *This is not the sole reason for expecting such a relationship. See Ref. 7._______________________________________________________ on a l/2 ?T dependence of the interlamellar spacing. Zener2 has developed a theory which leads to Soa 1/?V where So = the pearlite interlamellar spacing. This relation is as consistent with the data on interlamellar spacing as other relationships, although, as pointed out by Mehl and Hagel,1 the data are not sufficiently precise to consider the relationship as confirmed. The work of Darken, Fisher, and Galligan8 requires that the above be written where f = the thickness of ferrite layer between austenite and pearlite. The present paper is concerned with iron-carbon-manganese eutectoid alloys and reports experimental measurements of the following kinds: 1) the effect of