Institute of Metals Division - The Effect of Orientation Difference on Grain Boundary Energies - Discussion

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
C. G. Dunn F. Lionetti
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
3
File Size:
88 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1950

Abstract

W. G. BURGERS*—It seems almost certain that this investigation shows the way which finally, when more analogous data have been obtained, must lead to the understanding of many features of preferential growth-directions of crystals and of the occurrence of recrystallization textures. In this connection I should like to mention that Mr. Tiedema in my laboratory succeeded in developing an analogous method for preparing crystals in aluminum plates with a chosen crystal-lographic plane and direction parallel to the surface of the plate (to be published in Cryst. Ada). If such crystals were grown in high purity aluminum and test-pieces containing a few crystals such as the authors describe were prepared for this metal, it might be possible that due to the absence of growth obstructing particles, even in this low-melting point metal boundary displacements approaching equilibrium positions might be realized. With regard to the apparently marked drop in surface energy for orientation differences approaching zero degree, and orientation differences approaching those existing between twins, it seems of interest to remark that in aluminum a crystal growing at the expense of fine grained material cannot (or can only very reluctantly) absorb grains in either ap- proximately (within 5—10°) parallel or spinel twin orientation (May, Tiedema and Burgers, Nature (1948) 162, 740 and Cryst. Ada in press). Consequently with aluminum the method of preparing a crystal with a definite orientation does not succeed when the new crystal has to absorb its own texture; for example it is not possible to grow in a polycrystalline wire with a [lll]-texture a crystal with a [11 Indirection parallel to the wire axis (Tiedema: Cryst. Ada, in press). Finally I should like to mention the well-known fact (Burgers: Proc. Acad. Amsterdam (1947) 50, 723) that prolonged annealing of recrystallized nickel-iron sheet with cube-texture never succeeds in transforming this into one single crystal of the same orientation; if, by "secondary re-crystallization," large crystals are formed
Citation

APA: C. G. Dunn F. Lionetti  (1950)  Institute of Metals Division - The Effect of Orientation Difference on Grain Boundary Energies - Discussion

MLA: C. G. Dunn F. Lionetti Institute of Metals Division - The Effect of Orientation Difference on Grain Boundary Energies - Discussion. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1950.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account