Iron Recovery and Phosphorus Removal from Oolitic High-Phosphorus Haematite Using the FASTMELT® Process: A Comparative Study of Two Reductants

- Organization:
- The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Pages:
- 9
- File Size:
- 684 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 2017
Abstract
"The FASTMELT ® process was developed as an alternative to blast furnace ironmaking; in this process, high-quality molten iron is produced using direct reduction followed by high-temperature slag/metal separation. In this study, iron recovery and phosphorus removal from oolitic highphosphorus haematite using the FASTMELT® process was investigated. The performance of two reducing agents, coal and wood char, was compared. Direct reduction experiments indicated that with optimized reductant addition, the ore-char and ore-coal briquettes attained metallization values of 82% and 78%, respectively, and residual carbon contents of 0.24 and 2.35%, respectively. The slag/metal separation experiments revealed that molten iron containing 0.41% phosphorus and 0.021% silicon (by mass) was produced from optimally reduced ore-char briquettes, and molten iron containing 0.78% phosphorus and 0.91% silicon from optimally reduced ore–coal briquettes. The study indicates that carbonaceous materials with high CO2 reactivity are suitable for use in the FASTMELT ® process for phosphorus removal and iron recovery from oolitic high-phosphorus haematite. IntroductionIn China, the general depletion of iron-rich mineral reserves has led to many efforts to exploit low-grade and refractory ironcontaining resources for ironmaking (Liu et al., 2014). The efficient utilization of the highphosphorus oolitic haematite resources in central China has received considerable attention. The available resources of this material total approximately 3.0 billion tons. The oolitic units in the ore exhibit an onionlike structure with phosphorus-containing gangue layers of 2–10 µm thickness. The best concentrate produced from these resources contains approximately 50% iron (Fe) and 0.8–1.2% phosphorus (P) (by mass) (Ai, Yu, and Wei, 2009; Song et al., 2013; Wu, Wen, and Cen, 2011). Further removal of phosphorus from these ores using conventional beneficiation methods is not possible."
Citation
APA:
(2017) Iron Recovery and Phosphorus Removal from Oolitic High-Phosphorus Haematite Using the FASTMELT® Process: A Comparative Study of Two ReductantsMLA: Iron Recovery and Phosphorus Removal from Oolitic High-Phosphorus Haematite Using the FASTMELT® Process: A Comparative Study of Two Reductants. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2017.