Levels of Geotechnical Input for Design-Build Contracts

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Robert A. Robinson Michael S. Kucker Joseph P. Gildner
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
11
File Size:
65 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 2001

Abstract

Considerable controversy seems to exist over the extent and nature of information that should be provided in design-build type contracts. Much of this controversy may relate to the types of owners, ranging from private industry to state and federal agencies that are implementing design-build. Philosophies for the development of geotechnical information ranges from no information to a thorough investigation approaching that needed for final design. Several recent projects, such as the Channel Tunnel in Europe, Whittier Tunnel in Alaska, Tren Urbano in Puerto Rico, and Sound Transit in Seattle have taken varying approaches to providing and interpreting geotechnical information for bidders. The pros and cons of these various methods are discussed and assessed.
Citation

APA: Robert A. Robinson Michael S. Kucker Joseph P. Gildner  (2001)  Levels of Geotechnical Input for Design-Build Contracts

MLA: Robert A. Robinson Michael S. Kucker Joseph P. Gildner Levels of Geotechnical Input for Design-Build Contracts. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2001.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account