Life Cycle Cost Considerations In ARD Control: SME Versus Lime, Caustic Soda And Other Traditional Approaches

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 6
- File Size:
- 124 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 2000
Abstract
Lime, soda ash and similar precipitants have been the industry standard for treatment of acid rock drainage (ARD) because of their proven ability and low per-gallon operational cost. However, these methods carry serious environmental drawbacks and high life-cycle costs. KEECO’s Silica Micro Encapsulation (SME) technology has all the positive characteristics of conventional ARD-treatment systems but none of the drawbacks. SME achieves highly effective treatment in a single step, provides options for ARD prevention and recovery of metals, requires lower capital expenditures, generates smaller volumes of higher-density sludge, consistently passes leach tests, and eliminates long-term liabilities associated with potential metal remobilization and hazardous waste landfilling.
Citation
APA:
(2000) Life Cycle Cost Considerations In ARD Control: SME Versus Lime, Caustic Soda And Other Traditional ApproachesMLA: Life Cycle Cost Considerations In ARD Control: SME Versus Lime, Caustic Soda And Other Traditional Approaches. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2000.