Life Cycle Cost Considerations In ARD Control: SME Versus Lime, Caustic Soda And Other Traditional Approaches

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
A. L. Anderson J. T. Rybock
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
6
File Size:
124 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 2000

Abstract

Lime, soda ash and similar precipitants have been the industry standard for treatment of acid rock drainage (ARD) because of their proven ability and low per-gallon operational cost. However, these methods carry serious environmental drawbacks and high life-cycle costs. KEECO’s Silica Micro Encapsulation (SME) technology has all the positive characteristics of conventional ARD-treatment systems but none of the drawbacks. SME achieves highly effective treatment in a single step, provides options for ARD prevention and recovery of metals, requires lower capital expenditures, generates smaller volumes of higher-density sludge, consistently passes leach tests, and eliminates long-term liabilities associated with potential metal remobilization and hazardous waste landfilling.
Citation

APA: A. L. Anderson J. T. Rybock  (2000)  Life Cycle Cost Considerations In ARD Control: SME Versus Lime, Caustic Soda And Other Traditional Approaches

MLA: A. L. Anderson J. T. Rybock Life Cycle Cost Considerations In ARD Control: SME Versus Lime, Caustic Soda And Other Traditional Approaches. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2000.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account