Maintenance Evaluation – Guidelines to Ensure Improvement

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Paul D. Tomlingson
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
4
File Size:
657 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1991

Abstract

Will Rogers unwittingly commented on the essence of evaluations when he said: "We don't know what they don't know!" In so doing, he explained why managers have an obligation to verify that their personnel really know what is expected of them. Rogers further stated that "What we know may not be so!" Here, he suggests that managers must establish the correctness of facts on which they make decisions concerning the future of their organizations. Yet, there are some managers who may not have considered this basic wisdom. These are perhaps the ones who shun a solid, fact-finding evaluation. Instead, they trust to guesswork as a basis for attempting improvement. Without realizing it, they may be making incorrect decisions harmful to the very organization they are trying to improve. Unfortunately, an attitude of avoiding evaluations often permeates whole organizations when their managers fail to appreciate their importance. Recently, the following was found prominently displayed in the office of a maintenance manager. Regrettably, the facts of a subsequent evaluation established how imprudent his attitude was:
Citation

APA: Paul D. Tomlingson  (1991)  Maintenance Evaluation – Guidelines to Ensure Improvement

MLA: Paul D. Tomlingson Maintenance Evaluation – Guidelines to Ensure Improvement. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1991.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account