Merits Of Using Andalusite-Based Refractories Compared To Bauxite-Based Refractories

The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
M. Nyoka
Organization:
The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Pages:
4
File Size:
1109 KB
Publication Date:
Aug 1, 2013

Abstract

Historically bauxite-based refractories have been used in applications where andalusite-based refractories could work. Bauxite-based refractories were chosen over andalusite-based refractories mainly because of the availability of low-cost Chinese bauxite and also because many furnaces were designed by international companies that cannot easily access high-quality products. Currently, the availability of low-cost bauxite is under threat as a result of high export duties and tariffs as well as restrictions on the amount of material that China allows to be exported. South Africa is a major producer of andalusite, and this guarantees stability with respect to both availability and price. Refractories based on andalusite have an added economic advantage over bauxite-based refractories in that unlike bauxite, which requires high-temperature calcination before use, andalusite is used in its raw state. This paper constitutes a literature study of the merits, both technical and economic, of using refractories based on andalusite compared to bauxite-based refractories. Keywords bauxite, andalusite, refractory, furnaces, calcination.
Citation

APA: M. Nyoka  (2013)  Merits Of Using Andalusite-Based Refractories Compared To Bauxite-Based Refractories

MLA: M. Nyoka Merits Of Using Andalusite-Based Refractories Compared To Bauxite-Based Refractories. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2013.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account