Mined Material Management (M3)

Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Michael Davies
Organization:
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Pages:
9
File Size:
546 KB
Publication Date:
May 1, 2010

Abstract

Mined Material Management Meeting or Missing the Mark? o you agree that we have the technology to consistently design robust M3 facilities? ?YES your experience do these M3 facilities perform as expected during operations? ?USUALLY hat can be done to improve performance, e.g. better communications between project and operating teams, discontinuity between design and operational input by designers, others? ?UNDERSTANDINGWHY THINGS GO WRONG an we identify the key characteristics of ?good M3 facilities?, i.e. ones that are performing well? Can we identify ?good M3 facilities?, i.e. ones that perform well and can be held up as examples? ?WITHOUT QUESTION?? your opinion, for what reason do they not perform as expected? ?NO SINGLE REASON??..
Citation

APA: Michael Davies  (2010)  Mined Material Management (M3)

MLA: Michael Davies Mined Material Management (M3). Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 2010.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account