Mined Material Management Perspectives

- Organization:
- Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
- Pages:
- 7
- File Size:
- 704 KB
- Publication Date:
- May 1, 2010
Abstract
M3 -Technology HOWEVER:In practice we have limitations ?Clients: aggressive or cost based; inexperienced ?Consultants: ?expanding market w/training limitations ?Prescriptive designs ?Lack of senior oversight ?Regulators: difficult to retain technical capacity ?Stakeholders: perceptions and expectations ?Physical settings: challenging terrain, climate, soils/rock Do M3?s Perform? YES?Generally M3?s since mid-1960 do perform ?BC Closed Mines: Afton, Highmont, Trojan, Bethlehem, Cheni, SNIP, NO?ARD/ML issues?e.g. Equity Silver, Samatosum; selenium, cadmium, sulphate
Citation
APA:
(2010) Mined Material Management PerspectivesMLA: Mined Material Management Perspectives. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 2010.