Minerals Beneficiation - Continuous Countercurrent Decantation Calculations - Discussion

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
T. B. Counselman
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
1
File Size:
139 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1951

Abstract

C. G. McLachlan—In the foregoing paper the author has presented a very neat method for calculating the solution recovery for a countercurrent flowsheet. He has, however, based his calculations, as he states, on the assumption that "the concentration of dissolved value must be exactly the same in the overflow and underflow of any thickener." This assumption, which is usually made regardless of the type of calculation used, is "not strictly correct because diffusion of the dissolved gold in the solution associated with the solids as it progresses through the countercurrent system is far from being instantaneous, with the result that on a ton for ton basis, the assay of the solution in the thickener underflow is higher than in the corresponding thickener overflow. An agitator introduced into the flowsheet between thickeners will reduce, but not entirely eliminate, this difference. In practice we have found that the best way to take care of this condition— in addition to the use of one or more intermediate agitators—is to circulate 20 pct or 25 pct more solution than called for by the cheoretical calculation. This presents no difficulty provided that adequate thickener capacity is provided in the original design of the countercurrent circuit.
Citation

APA: T. B. Counselman  (1951)  Minerals Beneficiation - Continuous Countercurrent Decantation Calculations - Discussion

MLA: T. B. Counselman Minerals Beneficiation - Continuous Countercurrent Decantation Calculations - Discussion. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1951.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account