Mining - Load Reduction in Systematic Supports (Mining Engineering, May 1960, pg 484)

The proper transfer of roof loads from props and bolts to ribs and pillars can result in appreciable savings. The author shows how to plan such load reduction in underground mines. For openings in bedded rocks, analyzed by simple beam theory, it has been shown that roof loads can be shifted from one support to another.&apos; This transfer is effected by controlling the relative deflection of adjacent supports. If this action is used to reduce loads in the props or bolts and increase them in the ribs or pillars, it could be productive of economies averaging 30 pct. Such savings can be realized by: 1) using smaller artifical supports such as props and bolts, and 2) increasing loads in the rib to induce eventual failure for longwall caving. Since the rib is relatively load-insensitive, it provides a natural load sink. However, caution must be used in applying such permissive deflections, for while the supports are being handled properly, the stresses in the roof itself are very sensitive to such manipulations.1 An underground opening overlain by a relatively thin immediate roof, and a thick main roof, is usually laid out as shown in Fig. 1. The total open span (T) between pillars or ribs is calculated on the basis of the main roof, and the secondary spans (L) on the basis of the immediate roof, so that a complete accounting of the existing loads is made. For this purpose the immediate roof is treated as a uniformly loaded continous beam, which is an indeterminate structure as shown in Fig. 2(A). The term systematic supports places the following two restrictions on the continuous beam: 1) Spans between all supports are equal: uniformity of spans. 2) Loads on all supports (excepting ribs) are equal: uniformity of supports. The usual mode of analysis of such a structure by beam theory is to divide it up into a series of simply supported beams with end moments as shown in Fig. 2(B)2 The problem now is to transfer a maximum roof load to the rib from the span immediately adjacent to it by permitting its support to deflect, and yet not fail the roof. Once this has been done, the load can be equalized on all other supports by permitting further degrees of relative deflection. It is necessary, therefore, to determine an expression for the constant load on each support, and the required deflections, in terms of properties of the roof. From Fig. 1: T/L0 = No and T/L = N [1] Where: T = allowable span of main roof, ft. (Calculated from S = Mc/l) S is allowable modulus of rupture, psi. M is maximum moment, lb-ft (in this case wT2/12). c is distance from neutral axis to extreme fiber, ft. I is moment of inertia with respect to the neutral axis, ft4. L,, = allowable span of immediate roof, ft (calculated as was T). L = actual span of immediate roof, ft. N0 and N are pure numbers where No < N and N is the integer just higher than Nu. For example: If T =100 ft and L0 - 15 ft 100 N0 =100/15= 6.667 . . .N= 7 L = T/N = 100/7 = 14.28 ft Consequently N = No + n where n is a positive fraction i.e.: 0< n < 1 Since from Eq. 1, T = NL = N0L0 Lo /L = N/No = N/N-n