Monitoring Problems; Are We Really Measuring Coal Mine Subsidence?

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Robert A. Bauer
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
7
File Size:
1938 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1986

Abstract

Geology and weather effects produce natural ground movements that may be misinterpreted as mine subsidence. Weather, local geology and vegetation clearly influence the elevation of the ground surface through frost action and changes in groundwater levels and soil moisture content. Common practices of monument and benchmark design and placement do not address the problem of natural ground movements. Monuments can be designed to minimize some natural ground movements. Differential displacements can be reduced by knowledgeable placement of benchmarks and monuments which are of similar design and construction. Commonly, the threshold values of movement for the determination of mine-induced subsidence are dependent on the closure errors (accuracy) of individual surveys. Accuracy is more than the amount of closure error; it should include the range of elevation changes (error band) determined for each monument over a period of time before it is disturbed by mining. Multiple baseline surveys of the entire monitoring system, conducted before the onset of subsidence, should be used to establish subsidence detection limits.
Citation

APA: Robert A. Bauer  (1986)  Monitoring Problems; Are We Really Measuring Coal Mine Subsidence?

MLA: Robert A. Bauer Monitoring Problems; Are We Really Measuring Coal Mine Subsidence?. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1986.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account