New York Paper - The English versus the Continental System of Jigging-Is Close Sizing Advantageous?

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
H. S. Munroe
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
23
File Size:
884 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1889

Abstract

To those familiar with ore-dressing practice, it is hardly necessary to dwell upon the importance of the jig. Within its proper sphere no substitute has been found that does the work as well or as cheaply. Its capacity is large, it requires but little attention, and the losses are small. In one form or another, it is the principal machine used in the concentration of low-grade ores, and for the separation of one metallic mineral from another; and it is almost the only machine used for the purification of coal. The present paper is a study of the action of the jig in the light of results obtained in the Lake Superior copper mills, ad at the St. Joseph Lead Co.'s dressing-works, in Missouri; and a description of experiments undertaken with the view of reproducing and isolating the conditions of jigging, in order to develop the laws which underlie the process. There are two recognized systems of jigging, the English and the Continental or German. The English system is a development of the hand-jigging formerly employed in Cornwall and other metalliferous districts of England, and introduced by English miners to this country. In this method the crushed ore, coarse and fine together, is first jigged oh a
Citation

APA: H. S. Munroe  (1889)  New York Paper - The English versus the Continental System of Jigging-Is Close Sizing Advantageous?

MLA: H. S. Munroe New York Paper - The English versus the Continental System of Jigging-Is Close Sizing Advantageous?. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1889.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account