NPV or IRR? Why not both?

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
T. F. Torries
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
5
File Size:
362 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1999

Abstract

The primary criteria used by the mining industry to judge the merit of a project is internal rate of return (IRR) rather than net present value (NPV), although NPV is favored by academicians. This paper discusses the problems of IRR and NPV and compares the multigoal nature of the decision¬makers and their need for informa¬tion having the characteristics of NPV and IRR. The conclusions reached are that both NPV and IRR can be used for investment ranking, that NPV suffers the same multiple root problem as does IRR, and the use of conventional incremental IRR to reach NPV¬consistent project ranking is mis¬leading.
Citation

APA: T. F. Torries  (1999)  NPV or IRR? Why not both?

MLA: T. F. Torries NPV or IRR? Why not both?. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1999.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account