Operating Experience with Biological Iron Oxidation -Limestone Neutralization Treatment of Coal Mine Drainage

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 12
- File Size:
- 1347 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1972
Abstract
The areas of application, the limitations imposed by water chemistry as well as the advantages and disadvantages in the use of limestone for the treatment of coal mine drainage have recently been described by the authors (1),(2), (3). The process has been demonstrated in continuous, full-scale operation to yield a treated water meeting specifications established by the Pennsylvania Sanitary Water Board and containing excess alkalinity. Their final pH levels are usually less than seven, a condition which avoids consumption of excess neutralization reagents, but which occurs with lime-based processes and results from unwanted side reactions. Operating experience has been cited by Calhoun (4) using ferric waters while others (5), (6), (7), (8), (11), have reported on related research efforts. Despite the advantages including ?the relative simplicity, and minimal costs of the process, there have been very limited industrial applications of mine drainage neutralization with limestone. Although any treatment of these waters may be considered as a temporary control measure (9), the lack of feasible, immediate alternatives, the extensive magnitude. of the waters and the high cost of treatment requires that optimum processes should be utilized and that operating experience in their use be developed as is feasible. This paper will review treatment experience with a ferrous water of moderate pollution loading .
Citation
APA:
(1972) Operating Experience with Biological Iron Oxidation -Limestone Neutralization Treatment of Coal Mine DrainageMLA: Operating Experience with Biological Iron Oxidation -Limestone Neutralization Treatment of Coal Mine Drainage. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1972.