Papers - Milling Practice - Lead-zinc Separation at Mammoth-St. Anthony (T.P. 1714, Min. Tech., March 1944)

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
A. C. Dorenfeld
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
4
File Size:
176 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1947

Abstract

Ores of the Mammoth mining district, some 45 miles northeast of Tucson, Arizona, are treated by Mammoth-St. Anthony, Ltd. The ores now treated come from a complex system of veins and faults, comprising three mines, in close proximity: The Mohawk, Mammoth and Collins. The ore treated in the past was oxide ore, which contains economic amounts of gold, silver, lead, molybdenum, and vanadium (as wulfenite and vanadanite). The lead-zinc sulphide ore has never been treated before. The Ore The sulphide ore contains galena, sphalerite, marmatite, pyrite and some chal-copyrite, covellite, chalcocite and bornite, as well as small amounts of gold and silver. The value of the ore is principally in the lead and zinc content. The lead-zinc sulphides are substantially liberated at a minus 65-mesh grind. However, a large part of the chalcopyrite and other copper minerals is not freed, but remains as pin points on the sphalerite. Economically, the copper is unimportant. The gangue is a rhyolite granite, with very little limestone. There is no molybdenum or vanadikm in the sulphide ore. History of Sulphide Treatment Test work on samples of the sulphide ore was conducted by several equipment companies, the Arizona Bureau of Mines and the company's laboratory. Results of this test work indicated that for some reason, which at the time could not be explained, recoveries would be only about 65 per cent lead and 50 per cent zinc. Notwithstanding this, because of the nation's need for metals, the management built a 150-ton treatment plant. The mill was started in June 1942. During December 1942, using the standard method of treating lead-zinc ore, the monthly results were as shown in Table I. These results were poor. Too much lead was in the zinc concentrate, and too much zinc in the lead concentrate. It should be noted here. that prior to December attempts were made to depress the sphalerite with large and varied amounts of cyanide, zinc sulphate, and sodium sulphite with poor results.
Citation

APA: A. C. Dorenfeld  (1947)  Papers - Milling Practice - Lead-zinc Separation at Mammoth-St. Anthony (T.P. 1714, Min. Tech., March 1944)

MLA: A. C. Dorenfeld Papers - Milling Practice - Lead-zinc Separation at Mammoth-St. Anthony (T.P. 1714, Min. Tech., March 1944). The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1947.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account