Part IV – April 1968 - Communications - Superplasticity in 60Zn-40Al

It is well-established that hydrostatic pressure distribution is hardly achieved during uniaxial compaction of powders. All the previous investigations1-4 give consistent results and this variation is attributed to the die-wall friction. The conclusions are based on measurements of the density of very small portions of the compact. Although the analysis of the density or the strain distribution in the compact is very helpful in obtaining information about the stress distribution within a powder compact, it does not describe the problem from a more fundamental point of view. The densification in metal powder compacts takes place chiefly by plastic deformation (ignoring particle rearrangement) at the points of contact of the powder particles. The onset of yielding and subsequent growth of the contact areas (for spherical powders) take place fixed by a constant stress equal to three times the yield stress in tension or compression,5-7 assuming little or no work hardening. Therefore, by deforming spherical powders in the die and measuring the contact areas on each particle, the load at each contact point can be determined. In the present investigation, this was done by hot-pressing uniform spheres of lead, K-Monel, and sapphire. The details of the experiment have been described elsewhere.' The spheres were studied for the size and the number of contact points on each particle using a specially designed goniometer. It was found that the deformed faces that were approximately normal to the direction of pressing were about 2.2 times larger than those parallel to the direction of pressing. Fig. 1 shows the typical deformed sphere. A detailed study showed that the mean value of the contact areas on each sphere was within 5 pct for all the spheres in the die (ignoring those touching the die walls and the top and bottom of the die).' The spheres touching the die walls and the top and bottom of the die were found to have larger contact areas (8 to 10 pct) which indicates higher pressures in these regions of the compact and thus higher compact densities in these regions. These results show that density distribution calculated from such an experiment will give results consistent with the previous investigators. It is concluded, therefore, that the pressure distribution in the die is better understood by studying contact areas on each particle. 'R. Kamm, M. A. Steinberg, and J. Wulff: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1947, vol. 171, p. 439. 'Pol Duwez and Leo Zwell: I. Metals, 1949, vol. 1, p. 137. 'G. C. Kucynski and I. Zaplatynskyj: Trans. TMS-AIIME, 1956, vol. 206, p. 215. 'R. P. Seelig and J. Wulff: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1946, vol. 166, p. 492. 'H. Hencky: Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 1923, vol. 3, p. 241. "J. Ishlinsky: I. Appl. Math. Mech. USSR, 1944, vol. 8, p. 233. 'D. Tabor: Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), Ser. A, 1948, vol. 192, p. 247. 'Ashok K. Kakar and A. C. D. Chaklader: 1. Appl. Phys., 1967, vol. 38, p. 3223. Superplasticity in 60Zn-40Al David L. Holt THE occurrence of superplasticity in Al-Zn alloys is of interest because of its possible industrial exploitation.' The eutectoid composition (78Zn-22A1) has been the most extensively studied;'-= neck resistant flow and high strain rate sensitivity of flow stress (characteristic of superplasticity) are associated with a micron-size grain conferred on the alloy by an homo-genization and quench.5'6 Compositions away from the eutectoid have received comparatively little attention, especially from the viewpoint of relating the structural