Part IX – September 1968 - Communications - Discussion of "On the Mechanism of the Martensite-to-Austenite Reverse Transformation in an Fe-Ni Alloy" *

We will reply to Dr. Pitsch's discussion by 1) presenting in greater detail the single surface trace analysis which we performed on the reversed austenite plates in a single parent plate of martensite of known orientation, 2) relating the results of our analysis to the conclusions which Dr. Pitsch makes on the basis of our data, and 3) examining the validity of our selection of twenty-nine individual traces from the over 200 austenite plates which were observed in a surface of this single martensite plate. Fig. 7 shows a standard (001) projection of the martensite plate from which the austenite-martensite interface traces were taken. The traces are plotted on the projection as the small solid circles, and the great circles corresponding to the loci of plane normals which could contain each trace or could intersect the surface plane along the measured directions are also plotted. It can be seen that these great circles intersect at a point which corresponds to the normal of the surface plane on which the traces were observed. Also rate which occurred only at particularly low heating rates, see Figs. 1 and 3 in the paper.2 Since in this case the interpretation of Jana and Wayman is plausible and since we have no alternative to this interpretation, we would like to state only that the existence of a diffusion-controlled reversal at low temperatures seems to be not yet proved beyond any doubt. The author wishes to thank Professor G. Krauss for making available his manuscript prior to publication. It is also a pleasure to acknowledge the lively written discussions, which the author has had with Professors G. Krauss and C. M. Wayman prior to this communication. The financial support of the Deutsche For-schungsgemeinschaft for the work on which this communication is based is also gratefully acknowledged. plotted within small dotted circles which represent a i3 deg scatter in each of the twenty-four unit stereo-graphic triangles are our A and B poles7 and the pole P determined by Kessler and itsch.' The data presented in Fig. 7 permit a direct association of the measured traces and the various proposed habit plane poles for the reversed austenite plates in the martensite crystal. If the sample measurements do in fact