Part IX – September 1969 – Papers - Exploratory Study of Silicide, Aluminide, and Boride Coatings for Nitridation/ Oxidation Protection of Chromium Alloys

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Joseph R. Stephens William D. Klopp
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
7
File Size:
605 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1970

Abstract

Chromium alloys were coated with silicon, alumi-nuw, and boron by pack cementation. None of these simple coatings provided adequate nitridation/oxida-tion protection for a Cr -0.17pct Y alloy substrate as shown by a substantial Increase in the ductile -brittle transition temperature after air exposure for 100 hr at 2100°F. Iron-modified silicide coatings afforded good protection, holding the transition temperature of air-exposed specimens to 350° F compared to 200° F for uncoated unexposed specimens and 800°F for un-coated exposed specimens. Additional attractive cant-binations of modi-tying elements included Fe-mo, Fe-Mo-W, Fe-,Mo-W-Ti, and V-Mo-W-Ti. THE desirability of increased operating tempera-tures as a mcans of improving the performance of ad-vanced air breathing engines has resulted in emphasis on the development of materials with high operating temperature capabilities. Chromium, because of its relatively low density (7.19 g per cu cm), high melt-ing point (3410°F), and adequate strength upon alloy-ing, is a candidate material for turbine buckets and stator vanes of advanced air breathing engines. How-even, chromium is not without severe limitations, the major one being susceptibility to nitrogen embrittle-ment upon exposure to air at high temperatures.1,2 For example, a 25-hr air exposure of a Cr-5 pct W* * All compositions in wt pct. alloy at 2100°F produces a 600°F increase in the duc-tile-brittle transition temperature.' Although dilute alloying with such elements as yttrium, lanthanum, arid thorium3,4 or strong nitride formers5 has been shown capable of reducing nitrogen embrittlement, it is apparent that some additional form of surface protection, such as coatings or claddings, will be required for long time service in air breathing engines. Studies of aluiminide6 and silicide7 coatings and of nickel-base claddingsl on chromium alloys to date have suggested that these protection systems are inadequate. Of the aluminidc systems Studied,6 a simple aluminum and an Fe-Al coating on a Cr-5 pct W-0.1 pct Y alloy showed the lowest air exposure weight gains. However, the air exposures raised the ductile-brittle transition temperature of the coated specimens to above 1600°F from an initial level in unexposed specimens of about 500°F. A second in-vestigation for protection of Cr-5 pct W-0.1 pct Y employed gas pressure bonded alloy foils as protective claddings.1 An aluminized Ni-20 pct Cr-20 pct W alloy plus an unalloyed tungsten barrier layer gave the best performance with air exposure lives based on appearance and weight gains of over 600 hr at 2100°F. However, the bend ductile-brittle transition tempera-ture was increased to at least 1000°F after 100 hr at
Citation

APA: Joseph R. Stephens William D. Klopp  (1970)  Part IX – September 1969 – Papers - Exploratory Study of Silicide, Aluminide, and Boride Coatings for Nitridation/ Oxidation Protection of Chromium Alloys

MLA: Joseph R. Stephens William D. Klopp Part IX – September 1969 – Papers - Exploratory Study of Silicide, Aluminide, and Boride Coatings for Nitridation/ Oxidation Protection of Chromium Alloys. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1970.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account