Preventive And Breakdown Maintenance

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 8
- File Size:
- 533 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1968
Abstract
10.1-1. Relative Position of Maintenance as Compared to the Overall Mining Costs. The basic issue regarding the importance of maintenance in the modern mining industry must be faced squarely by the top manage- ment of each company before any real progress can be made in organizing a maintenance program for optimum effectiveness. Just a few decades ago the maintenance at coal mines consisted primarily of a blacksmith for sharpening picks and shoeing mules; as a result, probably less than 5%of the total mining cost went to maintenance and some 80% was operating expenses (operating labor). With each succeeding advance in equipment design towards larger, more complex, and more productive units, the pendu- lum swings the other way. As an example, haulage trucks have progressed through various stages in the past 20 years from 15-ton units to a 240-ton truck now in the "shakedown" or experimental stage. The following com- parison between 15-ton, 50-ton, and 100-ton haulage trucks clearly illus- trates this changing cost pattern in terms of percent of overall costs for running each size unit. [Maintenance 24% 44 % 51 % Operating labor 59 % 33 % 16% Operating supplies (fuel oil) 4 %. 4% 3% Labor burden and vac. pay 6 % 4% 3% Depreciation Total] From the preceding figures it is interesting to note that, as a rule, operat- ing costs go down as the equipment gets larger and the maintenance costs increase with the larger units. This same trend in cost variation applies to nearly all mechanical equipment used in surface mining from the large
Citation
APA:
(1968) Preventive And Breakdown MaintenanceMLA: Preventive And Breakdown Maintenance. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1968.