Rail Vs. Rubber Tired Handling-A Comparison From Two Projects

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
T. Skodack
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
2
File Size:
25 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1983

Abstract

This presentation will compare actual work site results for the loading and transport of shot rock for two major tunneling projects in North America. "SCARMAR" (the Canadian subsidiary of S & M Construction) is operating a rail bound Hagglund continuous gathering arm loader in combination with a Hagglund nine car shuttletrain system at the West End of Table Mountain on the B.C. Railway project near Tumbler Ridge, Canada. Al Johnson Construction is operating a Hagglund rubber tired continuous gathering arm loader in combination with haul trucks at the Rocky Mountain Pump Storage Project near Rome, GA. This paper will compare: 1) tunnel and ground conditions, 2) the total work cycle as it relates to mucking and haulage 3) efficiencies and related problems with the two systems 4) mucking and haulage rates 5) operating costs, and 6) recommendations for future large tunnel excavations. Manuscript not received in time for publication.
Citation

APA: T. Skodack  (1983)  Rail Vs. Rubber Tired Handling-A Comparison From Two Projects

MLA: T. Skodack Rail Vs. Rubber Tired Handling-A Comparison From Two Projects. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1983.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account