Remote Subdivisions And Their Possible Effect On Mineral Production In Arizona

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Ted H. Eyde
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
15
File Size:
432 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1976

Abstract

Both private industry and the Interior Department have become alarmed about the enormous amount of Federal land that has been withdrawn from appropriation either under the Mineral Leasing Laws or the Mining Law of 1872. According to a recent article by Gary Benethum and L. Courtland Lee, governmental actions have withdrawn nearly 400 million acres from the operation of the Mining Law of 1872 and over 500 million acres from the Leasing Laws. An addition al 100 million acres for the Mining Law of 1872 and 70 million acres for the Leasing Laws are either encumbered or being managed in such a way as to constitute a defacto withdrawal from mineral development. This means simply that mineral exploration end development under the Mining Law of 1872 is either prevented or discouraged in an area the size of the states of California, Arizona, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Idaho, and one half of Colorado combined. Under the Mineral Leasing Laws, exploration and development is either prevented or discouraged in an area equal in size to all the states east the Mississippi River, except Maine.
Citation

APA: Ted H. Eyde  (1976)  Remote Subdivisions And Their Possible Effect On Mineral Production In Arizona

MLA: Ted H. Eyde Remote Subdivisions And Their Possible Effect On Mineral Production In Arizona. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1976.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account