Reply to Contributed Discussion by P. S. B. Stewart, Bulletin and Proceedings 289(8) Nov./Dec. 1984 to "Drilling Patterns and Ore Reserve Assessments" by G. M. Philip and D. F. Watson

- Organization:
- The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Pages:
- 2
- File Size:
- 41 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1985
Abstract
P S B Stewart has rightly pointed to a possible obscurity in our paper on drilling patterns, viz. in comparing the improvement of a triangular drilling pattern over a square one, we used percentage improvements without always making clear their base. We hope, however, that other readers, like Stewart, have been able to understand the particular meaning from the context.Although different methods of estimation of an ore deposit will have different local bias (Philip and Watson, 1985), the critical relationship affecting the reliability of estimation of an unsampled location is the scale of local variation of the variable being estimated in comparison with the density and isotropy of sampling. This relationship overrides all other considerations.
Citation
APA:
(1985) Reply to Contributed Discussion by P. S. B. Stewart, Bulletin and Proceedings 289(8) Nov./Dec. 1984 to "Drilling Patterns and Ore Reserve Assessments" by G. M. Philip and D. F. WatsonMLA: Reply to Contributed Discussion by P. S. B. Stewart, Bulletin and Proceedings 289(8) Nov./Dec. 1984 to "Drilling Patterns and Ore Reserve Assessments" by G. M. Philip and D. F. Watson. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1985.