Reply To The Comments Made By F.S.A. De Frey On The Paper 'Design Of Merensky Reef Crush Pillar'

- Organization:
- The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Pages:
- 2
- File Size:
- 744 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 2011
Abstract
The discussion written by Dr de Frey suggests that mine design should be based on closely spaced stability pillars. However, this concept leads to low extraction ratios at depth. The concept of `crush' pillars in conjunction with more widely, appropriately spaced stability pillars allows for significantly larger extraction ratios, particularly at depth. It should be noted that the rock conditions in many areas of South African platinum and gold mines are good, allowing significant spans to be mined safely between stability pillars. `Crush' pillars are cut small enough to fail stably near the face under stiff loading conditions, and their residual strength is intended to support about 10 m rock height between stability pillars. While this support resistance cannot be achieved by conventional support, crush pillars have been proven to have the required capacity for this purpose. The concept of leaving smaller crush pillars with appropriately positioned stability pillars has been used successfully for more than 30 years in areas of South African platinum and gold mines.
Citation
APA:
(2011) Reply To The Comments Made By F.S.A. De Frey On The Paper 'Design Of Merensky Reef Crush Pillar'MLA: Reply To The Comments Made By F.S.A. De Frey On The Paper 'Design Of Merensky Reef Crush Pillar'. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2011.