RI 3791 Geophysical Survey of Arkansas Bauxite Region Pulaski, Saline, Lonoke, White, Grant, Hot Spring and Clark Counties

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
J. R. Thoenen M. C. Malamphy J. L. Vallely
Organization:
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Pages:
65
File Size:
4184 KB
Publication Date:
Feb 1, 1945

Abstract

"SUMMARYMagnetic and gravimetric surveys wore conducted over an area of ap¬proximately 1,400 square miles in the bauxite district of central Arkansas. The primary purpose of these surveys was to discover any possible buried and hitherto unknown syenite masses favorable for the occurrence of bauxite and to determine the approximate position of the buried flanks of the known syenite masses which might offer conditions favorable for the discovery of new ore bodies.Those surveys indicated that the various syenite outcrops were domes or bosses on a large batholith and that ether similar domes occurred on the batholith but did net outcrop.Drilling on the local geophysical anomalies proved the presence of 10 buried domes, but only 2 of them were found to project above the upper surface of the Midway clays, a requisite of conditions favorable for the occurrence of bauxite ore bodies. The geophysical data indicated the approximate configuration of the buried flanks of the known syenite coutcrops, and the portions of these flanks that project above the Midway have now been outlined more accurately by drilling.The geophysical surveys have produced evidence permitting the elimi¬nation of a large area as unfavorable for the occurrence of bauxite.Magnetic surveys extending along the Midway-Wilcox contact from Gurdon, in Clark County, on the southwest to Searcy, in White County, on the northwest have proved the improbability of the existence of other syenite masses similar to those found in Pulaski and Saline Counties. A detailed magnetic survey of the Magnet Cove area in Hot Spring County has proved that the syenite mass exposed in that locality is an isolated intrusion and entirely unrelated to those of Pulaski and Saline Counties. This syenite mass does not occur under conditions believed to be favorable for the occurrence of bauxite."
Citation

APA: J. R. Thoenen M. C. Malamphy J. L. Vallely  (1945)  RI 3791 Geophysical Survey of Arkansas Bauxite Region Pulaski, Saline, Lonoke, White, Grant, Hot Spring and Clark Counties

MLA: J. R. Thoenen M. C. Malamphy J. L. Vallely RI 3791 Geophysical Survey of Arkansas Bauxite Region Pulaski, Saline, Lonoke, White, Grant, Hot Spring and Clark Counties. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1945.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account