Rock Mechanics Implications Of Secondary Recovery Under Highwalls - Introduction

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
K. F. Unrug
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
13
File Size:
1944 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1983

Abstract

An overview of the history of mining technology, both past and present, shows that some of the new concepts being successfully applied have changed the reserve categorization and are having an overall impact on production. Past coal mining operations in the eastern coal fields, and especially in Appalachia, extensively utilized stripping with the predominately applied contour method. As a result, vast mountainous areas have abandoned benches left behind by past mining operations. While thicker seams previously stripped were usually mined by underground or mountain top removal methods, thin seams beyond technical or economical limits were left intact after contour mining had reached the ultimate height of the wall. These thin seams quite often contain high BTU, low ash and sulfur coal that makes them attractive for a secondary recovery due to the market requirements. Secondary highwall recovery has obvious potential and is economically attractive; however, with the present state of industrial experience and lack of analysis of site data, a trial and error approach is used by operators.
Citation

APA: K. F. Unrug  (1983)  Rock Mechanics Implications Of Secondary Recovery Under Highwalls - Introduction

MLA: K. F. Unrug Rock Mechanics Implications Of Secondary Recovery Under Highwalls - Introduction. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1983.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account